User Tag List

Page 32 of 48 FirstFirst ... 22303132333442 ... LastLast
Results 311 to 320 of 471
  1. #311
    Whicked Sick 'Zac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,090
    Country:
    Why not put a limit on one supplier, one healthpod, one SS and one SHP? I get people use them as invincible minishields, but its stupid


  2. #312
    ~Goddess~ |uK|fleecey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,804
    Country:
    Quote Originally Posted by 'Zac View Post
    Why not put a limit on one supplier, one healthpod, one SS and one SHP? I get people use them as invincible minishields, but its stupid
    Your opinion will not matter. :/

  3. #313
    Whicked Sick Higor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Full sail ahead!
    Posts
    3,676
    Country:
    Quote Originally Posted by 'Zac View Post
    Why not put a limit on one supplier, one healthpod, one SS and one SHP? I get people use them as invincible minishields, but its stupid
    That's gonna hurt a team that wants to use a SS as SS so badly.
    As said on a previous post:
    - Minishields Limited to 2-3, keep original HP (which is higher than now).
    - SS, SHP hp reduced from 30000 to 24000, maybe reduce nuke damage? (for XXL2g styled games).
    - All equipment supplier's collision size reduced by a 10% so they're less likely to block stuff.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by |uK|fleecey View Post
    Your opinion will not matter. :/
    Keep trying
    ------------------------------------- * -------------------------------------

  4. #314
    ~Goddess~ |uK|fleecey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,804
    Country:
    Quote Originally Posted by Higor View Post
    That's gonna hurt a team that wants to use a SS as SS so badly.
    As said on a previous post:
    - Minishields Limited to 2-3, keep original HP (which is higher than now).
    - SS, SHP hp reduced from 30000 to 24000, maybe reduce nuke damage? (for XXL2g styled games).
    - All equipment supplier's collision size reduced by a 10% so they're less likely to block stuff.

    - - - Updated - - -


    Keep trying
    whats the point of us players to raise our voice if we want siege to be fixed when its not?

  5. #315
    Dominating Scourge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    554
    Country:
    Quote Originally Posted by |uK|fleecey View Post
    whats the point of us players to raise our voice if we want siege to be fixed when its not?
    @'Zac

    Point taken, but I do have to ask what is siege-breaking about high-strength super suppliers

  6. #316
    Whicked Sick Higor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Full sail ahead!
    Posts
    3,676
    Country:
    Updated main list...
    ------------------------------------- * -------------------------------------

  7. #317
    Dominating Scourge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    554
    Country:
    Gotta repeat this request... Kickidlers really arbitrarily fucks with stealth. Is there a metric to tell the difference between a sneaker and a person who's just feigning idle?

  8. #318
    Whicked Sick Higor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Full sail ahead!
    Posts
    3,676
    Country:
    Quote Originally Posted by Scourge View Post
    Is there a metric to tell the difference between a sneaker and a person who's just feigning idle?
    No lol, KickIdlers should consider the player's View rotation, not the actual rotation (two different things).
    ------------------------------------- * -------------------------------------

  9. #319
    Dominating Scourge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    554
    Country:
    Quote Originally Posted by Higor View Post
    No lol, KickIdlers should consider the player's View rotation, not the actual rotation (two different things).
    It should. Sadly it does not \_(ツ)_/

  10. #320
    Whicked Sick Higor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Full sail ahead!
    Posts
    3,676
    Country:
    Current NetUpdateFrequency scalers on sgBuilding class are based on building HP%, to notify of damage as early as possible to clients... but it's kind of flawed as it increases CPU usage on the server, causing tickrate to become unstable a lot earlier than it should.

    So here's the small change I intend to do:
    - Create a global variable in SiegeMutator: bDropNetRate
    ** SiegeMutator will measure if server is having FPS issues using two criterias: Dedicated server (below tickrate) and Listen server (below MinDesiredFPS)
    - If bDropNetRate is True, then sgBuilding will apply lower NetUpdateFrequency, else it'll apply the higher one.
    - When a sgBuilding takes damage, NetUpdateFrequency is set to 50.

    So what does this do?
    Timer runs every 0.1 second, so during that small interval between a building is hit and the 0.1 timer occurs, the NetUpdateFrequency value will be VERY high (50), causing immediate notification of damage to nearby clients!!
    Then the timer normalizes the value back at what it should be (dropping net rate or not).
    So already damaged buildings won't have high NetUpdateFrequency values all the time.

    Also.
    Since we covered the immediate damage notification and this method keeps CPU usage scaled in a way that it attempts to comply with the TickRate, we can have moderate NetUpdateFrequency values when the server allows us to, or very aggresive low NetUpdateFrequency values when we need the server to run at optimal tickrate.

    So when a nuke is fired, instead of lowering server FPS when there's too many leeches for over 10 seconds, there'll probably be minor server stuttering DURING the explosion instead where it's less noticeable for clients.
    I'll also be making clientside simulation more aggresive to make it less necessary for the server to send so much data.

    ========
    0026 commits started, gonna post links here as I go.
    https://github.com/CacoFFF/SiegeIV-U...5b44acef1f1812

    - - - Updated - - -
    @SAM I wouldn't like to pile up so many package updates together.
    Can we get either LCWeapons_0017 or XC_Engine (+core) v18 up?
    ------------------------------------- * -------------------------------------

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Complaints I guess? Maybe just a rant? Or maybe just my two cents?
    By utbusta in forum Reports/Complaints & Appeals
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-30-2015, 08:03 PM
  2. Does anyone have any ideas?
    By Disturbed//*. in forum Map Making, Suggestions & Questions
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 06-17-2014, 05:53 PM
  3. Skin ideas.
    By Higor in forum Code Reviews
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 01-12-2013, 01:00 PM
  4. any ideas?
    By |uK|Melted_Ice in forum Technical Problems
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-16-2012, 01:53 PM
  5. Ideas anyone?
    By AuSSiE^uK in forum Technical Problems
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-12-2012, 04:03 PM

Members who have read this thread : 159

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •