Various players abusing McSwartlzy roof glitch - Page 2

User Tag List

Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 77
  1. #11
    Whicked Sick Chamberly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Vandora Temple
    Posts
    5,488
    Country:
    I told fleece to tell me which map that have the shoot through and told her I'll fix em.


    http://irc.lc/globalgamers/uscript for uscript discussion.

  2. #12
    Whicked Sick Higor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Full sail ahead!
    Posts
    3,676
    Country:
    Add a mover outline so that no projectiles can pass... but you can still make a tele thru (since they can spawn inside movers).
    Make said outline using 4 invisible long cubic brushes with the exact amount of size to cover the gap, whether the outline extrudes into the lower zone, or the higher zone doesn't matter. (prefferable into the higher zone).
    ------------------------------------- * -------------------------------------

  3. #13
    Administrator SAM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    8,296
    Country:
    I think there's a larger discussion to be had here. Why is this considered abuse. There are maps such as orbital, civil war etc where you can build through walls and it is allowed??

  4. #14
    ~Goddess~ |uK|fleecey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,812
    Country:
    Quote Originally Posted by SAM View Post
    I think there's a larger discussion to be had here. Why is this considered abuse. There are maps such as orbital, civil war etc where you can build through walls and it is allowed??
    Because I asked you if shooting through glass with any weapon is allowed and you told me no.

    A pm from 2012 when i asked.

    Quote Originally Posted by SAM
    It's not allowed through Walls but it will be fixed when sw get off his bum
    not blaming this on sw, but it never got fixed, therefor shooting through window isnt allowed.


    Normally you were suppose to only make tele through wall and nothing else as far as I heard.
    Last edited by |uK|fleecey; 10-08-2015 at 08:29 AM.

  5. #15
    Administrator SAM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    8,296
    Country:
    Ok. I'm not disagreeing with anything here, just starting a discussion that's all.

    If both bases have the same advantage / disadvantage then is this something that needs to result in bans? It does make the map more tactical whilst also creating more areas to defend or monitor? Wouldn't this actually make the game more tactically diverse?

  6. #16
    Killing Spree 1Shot1Kill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    224
    Country:
    Quote Originally Posted by Chamberly View Post
    I told fleece to tell me which map that have the shoot through and told her I'll fix em.
    I posted a demo in the bans section when I reported Expander, you should be able to get the name / version from that. It would be great to either fix the gap or remove the glass all together.

    R,
    1S1K

    --- Updated ---

    Quote Originally Posted by SAM View Post
    Ok. I'm not disagreeing with anything here, just starting a discussion that's all.

    If both bases have the same advantage / disadvantage then is this something that needs to result in bans? It does make the map more tactical whilst also creating more areas to defend or monitor? Wouldn't this actually make the game more tactically diverse?
    It does add another dimension to the game for this map if allowed. And I don't care either way, I just want a concensus on this.
    Last edited by 1Shot1Kill; 10-08-2015 at 12:45 PM.

  7. #17
    Moderator |uK|kenneth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,616
    Country:
    Quote Originally Posted by SAM View Post
    Ok. I'm not disagreeing with anything here, just starting a discussion that's all.

    If both bases have the same advantage / disadvantage then is this something that needs to result in bans? It does make the map more tactical whilst also creating more areas to defend or monitor? Wouldn't this actually make the game more tactically diverse?
    i kinda like sams idea.
    as you all know that map is kinda hard to end or even reach (when teams are even obviously) so this can indeed be seen as another tactic.

  8. #18
    Whicked Sick Chamberly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Vandora Temple
    Posts
    5,488
    Country:
    Quote Originally Posted by 1Shot1Kill View Post
    I posted a demo in the bans section when I reported Expander, you should be able to get the name / version from that. It would be great to either fix the gap or remove the glass all together.
    I'm talking about other map not just this one! :P

    Quote Originally Posted by SAM View Post
    If both bases have the same advantage / disadvantage then is this something that needs to result in bans? It does make the map more tactical whilst also creating more areas to defend or monitor? Wouldn't this actually make the game more tactically diverse?
    Imo if the map is equally the same I don't think I'd ban on that, because there is only a few that doesn't let such build through evenly like teleporter on both side (forgot which clarion). It can create nice advantage/disadvantage point, more or less as the game bring to you dealing with...

    But it can be possible to check around if it's even, and posting result to find any difference of a map.


    http://irc.lc/globalgamers/uscript for uscript discussion.

  9. #19
    Administrator SAM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    8,296
    Country:
    More input on this from others please. If I saw this happen. I wouldn't think omg map abuse (it exists on both bases). I'd think we'll done, that was some brilliant play to capture the top. But that's just me....

  10. #20
    Moderator ][X][~FLuKE~][X]['s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    1,367
    Country:
    chamberly should know full well that shooting through glass is not allowed, myself and fleece have posted numerous times that it is bannable.

    How are the players meant to figure it out? simple, don't do things that are not physically possible....how is that tough to understand? If others here used a bot would you use one as well? saying "He did it so I thought it was ok" is doing exactly that, don't do it regardless of who else is doing it, building tele through a wall is only acceptable if it is to a nuke room or area that will give no significant advantage, using a glitch to end a game is ridiculous, there is no skill in that, a admin might as well just come in and stop the game using nexgen. Don't abuse glitches, utilize them with a respectable sense of sportsmanship. Some maps last a long time but ending it with a glitch has wasted all that time the players have spend building up the bases.

    I am a strict moderator but very fair and will always give a warning first and then a ban if it is done again, usually a warning is sufficient but admins can't see what goes on most of the time as some glitches like clarion or over in less than a minute if tele is built through the wall. all that can be done then is a warning, banning makes it seem pointless at that stage.

    I know a lot of personalities here are "Dilligaf" or "NOGAF", but I like sportsmanship and despise those who jump in, fuck up a game to end it, then kiss their own ass thinking they are "Awesome" then they leave. That type of person pisses me off like the are trolling the server.


    Quote Originally Posted by SAM View Post
    More input on this from others please. If I saw this happen. I wouldn't think omg map abuse (it exists on both bases). I'd think we'll done, that was some brilliant play to capture the top. But that's just me....
    invis+trans then tele..... I don't see any skill in that, build a few conts then tele gives you time to get through if there are SP's. its not skill, where in that is the objective of assaulting the core? I hate it if people on the same team as me do it as well, kinda deflates the enjoyment of the game like a cheap shot win.

    Maps shouldn't be abused by glitch exploits. I even hate how people are abusing the shit out of the sniper and crouch bug, blatantly abusing it. But like I have already pointed out, I like sportsmanship and using exploits is not that.
    Last edited by ][X][~FLuKE~][X][; 10-09-2015 at 02:42 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Blaze abusing it's admin..?
    By sketchturner in forum Bans
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 04-09-2013, 01:07 PM
  2. {DOU}(-:_NATHAN_:-) and . abusing Kickvote
    By Neff in forum Reports/Complaints & Appeals
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-03-2012, 09:35 AM
  3. Ahmet abusing Kickvote
    By Banny in forum Reports/Complaints & Appeals
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 08-24-2012, 01:00 PM
  4. abusing Kick Vote
    By HIGH[+]Wah_JD in forum Reports/Complaints & Appeals
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-29-2012, 02:11 PM
  5. about IDLE PLAYERS AND fag players
    By [R]^Osyris in forum Technical Problems
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 02-20-2011, 12:57 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •