Super Protector Limit - Page 3

User Tag List

View Poll Results: Add Super Protector Limit

Voters
25. You may not vote on this poll

  • Yes

    10 40.00%

  • No

    15 60.00%
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 66
  1. 02-27-2012 #21
    SAM
    Status
    Offline
    Administrator SAM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    8,296
    Country:
    I think it's time already that you optimised siege....

    Also, this limit and removable malarky is stupid. You think we have a problem with container removers? You just wait until super pros are removable.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 02-28-2012 #22
    ChanClan
    Guest ChanClan's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by $carface View Post
    I think it's time already that you optimised siege....

    Also, this limit and removable malarky is stupid. You think we have a problem with container removers? You just wait until super pros are removable.
    Indeed. Optimize the non-lagability too..
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 02-28-2012 #23
    |uK|kenneth
    Status
    Offline
    Moderator |uK|kenneth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,616
    Country:
    Quote Originally Posted by $carface View Post
    I think it's time already that you optimised siege....

    Also, this limit and removable malarky is stupid. You think we have a problem with container removers? You just wait until super pros are removable.
    doesnt need to be removable if people doesnt place it on stupid places also i vote yes fot the mini shield as removable
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 02-28-2012 #24
    Feralidragon
    Status
    Offline
    Rampage Feralidragon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    374
    Country:
    Quote Originally Posted by $carface View Post
    I think it's time already that you optimised siege....
    That's WildCard's job imo, I don't want to step in anyone's toes and afaik he's still active on doing it, I have a huge respect for developers in that aspect, so I always attempt to not "invade" other coders "territory" of sort to speak.

    However, that doesn't mean I won't do a new version soon, actually I was thinking to do my own version of siege but completely new from scratch in my own way, and not building it from an existing one (and yeah, it would be extremely optimized). But the point of this siege would never be to replace the current one, it will be slightly different one (not much in gameplay, but on visuals and new buildings).

    But before I do any of that, I have to finish and release another mod first...

    Nali Weapons 3 | Community UT mods
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 02-28-2012 #25
    HIGH+CAMILO
    Status
    Offline
    Moderator HIGH+CAMILO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Florianópolis - Brazil
    Posts
    1,387
    Quote Originally Posted by $carface View Post
    I think it's time already that you optimised siege....

    Also, this limit and removable malarky is stupid. You think we have a problem with container removers? You just wait until super pros are removable.
    Sam got a point...
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 02-28-2012 #26
    |uK|fleecey
    Status
    Offline
    ~Goddess~ |uK|fleecey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,812
    Country:
    Quote Originally Posted by ChanClan View Post
    I think you mean Super Containers, which we could up to 3 just for giggles....
    No, I meant super pro obviously.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 02-28-2012 #27
    SAM
    Status
    Offline
    Administrator SAM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    8,296
    Country:
    Quote Originally Posted by Feralidragon View Post
    That's WildCard's job imo, I don't want to step in anyone's toes and afaik he's still active on doing it, I have a huge respect for developers in that aspect, so I always attempt to not "invade" other coders "territory" of sort to speak.

    However, that doesn't mean I won't do a new version soon, actually I was thinking to do my own version of siege but completely new from scratch in my own way, and not building it from an existing one (and yeah, it would be extremely optimized). But the point of this siege would never be to replace the current one, it will be slightly different one (not much in gameplay, but on visuals and new buildings).

    But before I do any of that, I have to finish and release another mod first...
    I haven't spoke to WC lately but I don't think he is actively dev'ing anymore..
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 02-28-2012 #28
    Feralidragon
    Status
    Offline
    Rampage Feralidragon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    374
    Country:
    Well, at least from what I have seen so far some weeks ago he released a new version of his Gauntlet gametype, and before that some screens relative his own new version of siege here in this forum.... idk how he's progressing as of now, but I am assuming that he's still on it.

    I have been hesitant in making anything for siege exactly because of that.

    But anyway, either he releases a new one or not, I will do my own from scratch. I play siege a lot, and there are a lot of things there that annoy me and that I personally miss and want implemented and fixed.
    After I release the mod I am doing now I "may" start on it.

    But prepare though, this time containers should "look" like containers, protectors like protectors, etc (the nuke fx should be different as well, etc), but everything low poly and most of them opaque rather than translucent so you can see many at once (reducing visual lag some people get), yet detailed enough and distinguishable.
    I have some quite ambitious ideas for siege that should make it fair, far more interesting and noob-friendly (in a good way for everyone), but you will have to wait though.

    Nali Weapons 3 | Community UT mods
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 03-30-2012 #29
    The Cybernator
    Status
    Offline
    The Cybernator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    94
    Country:
    As far as I understand, this would be the only build that is limited in the game. I think one of the most attractive principles of siege is the flexibility involved in how you build your base. I think that when lots of SP's are around it is fun. It makes you think strategically. Perhaps, if you feel they are dominating the game, just up the RU requirement for SP's.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 03-31-2012 #30
    |uK|Grimreaper
    Status
    Offline
    Whicked Sick |uK|Grimreaper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    1,315
    Country:
    what about minishields?

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Removing Somebody else's Super Protector??
    By Banny in forum zp| * * * -=[SIEGE]=- |uK| One Night Stand -=[SIEGE]=- Server * * *
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 04-11-2015, 09:19 PM
  2. CTF-BT-Limit
    By Raylen in forum Map Making, Suggestions & Questions
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 04-06-2015, 04:10 AM
  3. put cap limit
    By Player88 in forum zp| [====] [PURE] [INSTAGIB] [UK] [====]
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-12-2013, 12:51 PM
  4. No Cap limit
    By B|iss in forum z p | - = | C O M B O I N S T A G I B | N W C T F | S A C T F | = -
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-28-2011, 11:40 AM

Members who have read this thread : 46

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules