User Tag List

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27

Thread: $n!p3r

  1. #11
    Rampage damic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Po(L)and
    Posts
    366
    Country:
    so.... ban $n!p3r or not?
    <@Rays> damic on d = autowin

  2. #12
    Moderator .seVered.]['s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Near a River and Under a Bridge
    Posts
    2,125
    Country:
    Quote Originally Posted by damic View Post
    so.... ban $n!p3r or not?
    Course not, CHEESY isn't a ban, just means he'd be a NO PICK or LAST PICK in a pug. (or SPEC if he's on my team). If he'll do that kind of cheesy, he'll do worse things in a match and isn't a 'team' player, or just a young guy.

  3. #13
    Rampage damic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Po(L)and
    Posts
    366
    Country:
    Ok, thx for info , but...
    I am sure that if I just did it you would you give me ban. ;o
    <@Rays> damic on d = autowin

  4. #14
    The Big Ticket Moskva's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Siege Hall of Fame
    Posts
    2,347
    Country:
    Man... lol pugs these days are usually 10 lastpicks all together J3J3J3J
    About the topic, making the first supplier in the enemy base cant be called tactic since only a stupid idiot would do it, now about a shp... thats more intelligent
    Season ranks: MLSG - #45 Semis, MLSG II - #38 Finals, MLSG III - #34 Finals, GU.Siege - #32 5th Place, IST - #11 CHAMPION

  5. #15
    Whicked Sick Higor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Full sail ahead!
    Posts
    3,676
    Country:
    Mmmhhhh, Sev I do remember that IcePost match.

    My teammates replenishing health at your base and me rocket killing from air (lol super jetpack) and high neutroning was indeed devastating.
    ------------------------------------- * -------------------------------------

  6. #16
    Moderator .seVered.]['s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Near a River and Under a Bridge
    Posts
    2,125
    Country:
    Quote Originally Posted by damic View Post
    Ok, thx for info , but...
    I am sure that if I just did it you would you give me ban. ;o
    Not at all, I don't ban for foolishness, just broken rules...

    Quote Originally Posted by |uK|Moskva View Post
    Man... lol pugs these days are usually 10 lastpicks all together J3J3J3J
    About the topic, making the first supplier in the enemy base cant be called tactic since only a stupid idiot would do it, now about a shp... thats more intelligent
    I was trying to make the point as QUIETLY as possible... but now it's out there.... DOH! Yes, SHP is THE WORST as far as grabbing SP's attention and taking THE LONGEST to get destroyed.

  7. #17
    Rampage Neff's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    398
    Quote Originally Posted by .se\/ered.][ View Post
    Not at all, I don't ban for foolishness, just broken rules...



    I was trying to make the point as QUIETLY as possible... but now it's out there.... DOH! Yes, SHP is THE WORST as far as grabbing SP's attention and taking THE LONGEST to get destroyed.
    longer to get destroyed than invincible warhead?

  8. #18
    Moderator .seVered.]['s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Near a River and Under a Bridge
    Posts
    2,125
    Country:
    Quote Originally Posted by Neff View Post
    longer to get destroyed than invincible warhead?
    Not sure, probably not... iWarhead is better because it provides less RU ( I think). Might put that on the EVALUATE list... ALSO, that make's a good point... we have no COUNTER weapons for this... maybe we could make a countermeasure for the SP's... one that doesn't give RU and live's long enough to PULL the focus of multiple SP's for more than 5 seconds.

  9. #19
    Rampage Neff's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    398
    If people begin building the first Supplier/SS/SHP invincible in your base you could build platforms above/bellow (not sure if it works from the side) as well as a Super Protector on the side of the platform not facing the invincible Supplier/SS/SHP. Due to the nature of platforms being solid (you can stand on them and not get bounced off like containers) Super Protectors wont be able to shoot something on the other side of it.

    This is an untested theory to me anyway... I know SP wont hit something through a platform but I don't know if a) it will try to anyway b) if it does will it still shoot at enemy players in range or get distracted.
    Last edited by Neff; 08-23-2012 at 06:57 PM.

  10. #20
    Weetabix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    41
    Country:
    Quote Originally Posted by .se\/ered.][ View Post
    Not sure, probably not... iWarhead is better because it provides less RU ( I think).
    I remember doing that once, it was gone in less than 5 seconds. Maybe i did it wrong though

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •