Tired of removing without warning

**BONZ** · 02-28-2013

My understanding was that minishields gave out no RU whatsoever when hit, unless another build is close enough by

**_Leo_** · 02-28-2013

Originally Posted by K_Soze

Also, if you have extra minishields near the SS/SH location there on Minicivil, when someone shoots rockets, say, and hits them it will splash onto those charging up in the supplier. ... Hope this helps.

Yes, it helps. Anyway, I was talking about the big shield. But I guess it's the same for that matter. I knew about the damage spreading around near buildings but I thought shields were out of such behaviour. Is there a distance limit for the damage splashing? I mean, sometimes, even if it's a leech, a shield or a cont can give the team the time it needs for getting out of a rain of missiles and bullets.

**][X][~FLuKE~][X][** · 02-28-2013

only post here i see that stands is fleecey's, it doesnt matter what anyones opinions are or how "skilled" you believe to be at siege strategy and gameplay, You simply do not remove other peoples builds, irrelevant if you think its a bad build or a leech.

Try taking more time to SHOW them how to build right on the next map, everyone was a beginner at one time, fleece gave me tips when i first started, i built leech and i didnt know what a leech was at the time, so instead of yelling at me and rage removing my builds, it took 20 seconds to explain what a leech was and i never did it again and removed it.

its a public server, not a match or PUG server, each player is allowed to build what they like, unhindered, if you dont like it then join PUG and have matches with other skilled players, easy answer really.

The only time i would ever agree a remove is right is say on clarion for example, the SC is 1 sec from finishing and the enemy slip in, then it completes building , they destroy the tele then attack core, THAT IMO is the only justifiable time to remove anyones builds, the only other time i would say it would be ok is if the player has left the server and they left a leech, once they leave, it has no owner, therefore no-one to upset.

Everyone can have their opinions on whats right or not, but no one has the right to act on their own opinion and remove other peoples builds....period.

**mal** · 02-28-2013

thing is i dont really care about leeches myself except when its a really obv one.
i will remove everything if it hurts my team like a forcefield next to sup or some containers next to sup..

[R]^EnZ|nO!zTeR* · 02-28-2013

mira YPF.... si recuerdas el mapa era clarion... �recuerdas?, hiciste un forcefield afuera del core no tengo idea para que y varios en el equipo querian removerlo por tema de leech y es mas dificil defender las nukes enemigas... asi que pedazo de noobs estupido aprende a jugar siege mierda... tengo el derecho de removerlo porque yo se lo deficil que es matar nukes con el forcefield afuera... si kieres hacer uno hazlo dentro para cubrir algo el core
no es con mala intencion ni nada pero muchas veces creas forcefield estupidos o en el suplier o en el core

.................................................. ..........................

YPF look .... if you remember the map was clarion ... You remember, you did a forcefield outside the core so I have no idea and several on the team wanted to remove him and leech issue is more difficult to defend the enemy nukes ... so stupid piece of noobs learn to play siege shit ... I have the right to remove it because I know what it is to kill deficil nukes outside the forcefield ... if kieres make one do something to cover within the core
not mean any harm or anything but sometimes think stupid forcefield or suplier or core

**~~D4RR3N~~** · 02-28-2013

Originally Posted by [R

^EnZ|nO!zTeR*;52885]mira YPF.... si recuerdas el mapa era clarion... �recuerdas?, hiciste un forcefield afuera del core no tengo idea para que y varios en el equipo querian removerlo por tema de leech y es mas dificil defender las nukes enemigas... asi que pedazo de noobs estupido aprende a jugar siege mierda... tengo el derecho de removerlo porque yo se lo deficil que es matar nukes con el forcefield afuera... si kieres hacer uno hazlo dentro para cubrir algo el core
no es con mala intencion ni nada pero muchas veces creas forcefield estupidos o en el suplier o en el core

.................................................. ..........................

YPF look .... if you remember the map was clarion ... You remember, you did a forcefield outside the core so I have no idea and several on the team wanted to remove him and leech issue is more difficult to defend the enemy nukes ... so stupid piece of noobs learn to play siege shit ... I have the right to remove it because I know what it is to kill deficil nukes outside the forcefield ... if kieres make one do something to cover within the core
not mean any harm or anything but sometimes think stupid forcefield or suplier or core

Sin malas intenciones ni nada enzo, pero, cuando uses google traductor para posts en ingles, procura escribir bien, porque siempre hay alguien que no va a entender y no entiende ni chucha de espa�ol

______________________________

No bad intentions or anything enzo, but whenever you are translating a post to english for your posts, try to write worda better, because then, when text is translated, it gets fucked up and ends up being some weird non-sense shit!

**Novak** · 02-28-2013

Originally Posted by _Leo_

Yes, it helps. Anyway, I was talking about the big shield. But I guess it's the same for that matter. I knew about the damage spreading around near buildings but I thought shields were out of such behaviour. Is there a distance limit for the damage splashing? I mean, sometimes, even if it's a leech, a shield or a cont can give the team the time it needs for getting out of a rain of missiles and bullets.

I was saying if you make a building too close to the supplier or where players walk right out of the supplier then it will cause splash damage onto the players. For example, a common error on bathrooms eq1 or bathrooms fixed when SS is made outside of the tub is for new conts to be built too close to the SS or, if the conts are already built, the SS gets placed too close to the conts. In either case, the conts need to be removed promptly and rebuilt. Enemy players will shoot multiple rockets and hit the conts, causing damage to players in the supplier if not removed and replaced farther away.

I think Higor or someone else could comment on splash damage to other buildings. I think the current version limits or eliminates that damage.

**|uK|fleecey** · 03-01-2013

Originally Posted by [R]^EnZ|nO!zTeR*

mira YPF.... si recuerdas el mapa era clarion... �recuerdas?, hiciste un forcefield afuera del core no tengo idea para que y varios en el equipo querian removerlo por tema de leech y es mas dificil defender las nukes enemigas... asi que pedazo de noobs estupido aprende a jugar siege mierda... tengo el derecho de removerlo porque yo se lo deficil que es matar nukes con el forcefield afuera... si kieres hacer uno hazlo dentro para cubrir algo el core
no es con mala intencion ni nada pero muchas veces creas forcefield estupidos o en el suplier o en el core

.................................................. ..........................

YPF look .... if you remember the map was clarion ... You remember, you did a forcefield outside the core so I have no idea and several on the team wanted to remove him and leech issue is more difficult to defend the enemy nukes ... so stupid piece of noobs learn to play siege shit ... I have the right to remove it because I know what it is to kill deficil nukes outside the forcefield ... if kieres make one do something to cover within the core
not mean any harm or anything but sometimes think stupid forcefield or suplier or core

Doesn't matter if you or anyone else dislike a FF next at the core, it's not your right to remove if because you dislike it! He placed it for a reason, so stop removing others stuff.

**terminator** · 03-01-2013

Originally Posted by |uK|fleecey

Doesn't matter if you or anyone else dislike a FF next at the core, it's not your right to remove if because you dislike it! He placed it for a reason, so stop removing others stuff.

What makes u so sure that people actually place things like forcefield for a reason... hmmm... if i made forcefield on a middle of a map and someone removed it.. should i report the player who actually removed it or what :S
Cuz i've seen bunch of pointless minisheilds and other stuffs but didn't remove it.

**'Zac** · 03-01-2013

there is difference between a reason and a ' no idea' or an I dont know reason. if its one of the last 2, then its removable. if its actually reasonable, for example, me putting a super container near supplier on clarion = holds up more damage and repairs the buildings around it quicker. i think thats a good reason

User Tag List

Thread: Tired of removing without warning

Thread Tools

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

Similar Threads

Warning in my UT.log

FireFox script warning

WARNING: This aint kool-aid

Warning:

Im getting tired of this

Members who have read this thread : 89

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions